Let’s say this, right now — in this context, dosage has no connection to doping horses. None. Nada. Zip.
If you follow horse-racing to any extent, you’ve heard the term and wondered what it meant. Maybe an explanation made your eyes glaze over. After all, you don’t need to know all the ins-and-outs.
So, this post is just a newbie’s introduction. And, if you stay long enough to read the entire post, you’ll find a little secret at the end that blew me away when I first read it.
Dosage is a statistical tool used to predict performance.
Dosage figures are based on a list that works like a “Who’s Who” of thoroughbred breeding.
About a hundred years ago, a French thoroughbred racing scholar named Lt. Col. J.J. Vuillier conducted a study of the top runners in England and France.
Vuilllier noticed that certain stallions kept appearing on those pedigrees. He studied their records and determined which characteristics they passed on.
He called these stallions the chefs-de-race or “chiefs of racing.” What’s more, he noticed that every decade or so, new stallions showed up on the list.
Chefs-de-race (Chiefs of Racing)
As of this writing, there are 210 stallions listed.
So. who’s among them? Legendary horses like Man O’War, Secretariat and War Admiral. So is modern stallion A.P. Indy, a leading sire whose stud fee is $300,000 for a live foal.
But who’s not on the list? For one, War Admiral’s famous-from-the-movies vanquisher Seabiscuit.
Nor is Storm Cat, the now-pensioned stallion who used to command $500,000 in stud fees.
Winning a US or UK Triple Crown title isn’t a lock for inclusion as a chef, either. Only six Triple Crown winners — three from the U.S. and three from the U.K. — are listed as chefs.
Of those US Triple Crown winners, Affirmed isn’t listed, but his famous rival Alydar is.
The Influential Genes of the Chefs
A stallion on the list is a given an aptitudinal designation that’s indicated by a letter, but it’s not S for “speed” or E for “endurance.” Think more metaphorically.
“Brilliant” is used for “speed.” And “Professional” is used for endurance or stamina.
So, B=Brilliant (speed), I=Intermediate, C=Classic, S=Solid and P=Professional(stamina).
And you read that from left to right, you can see what resembles a matter-of-degrees from Brilliant (fast) to Professional(tough).
Now, let’s go back to the chefs-de-race list.
When you look down the columns of names, you’ll see parentheses with the letters B, I, C, S, P. Some listings just have one letter, others have combinations of two.
Where the Numbers Come In
Now, here’s where dosage gets mathy and makes people’s heads spin.
When a chef-de-race is in a horse’s pedigree, a numerical value is determined by the generation that sire appears. That makes up the Dosage Profile.
The numbers are assigned along the B-I-C-S-P lines. Let’s take a look at current “Horse of the Year” Curlin, whose dosage profile is 9-3-8-0-0.
Remember B(rilliant) — I(ntermediate) — C(lassic) — S(olid) — P(rofessional) which means …
A Range from Speed to Stamina
No doubt, according to that layout of numbers — with so many to the left of center — Curlin is bred for speed. He’s also bred to go the distance of the Classic races like the US Triple Crown. But the numbers say he’s a little light on the endurance/stamina. After all, he lost his Belmont Stakes bid, a 1-1/2 mile race, to the filly Rags to Riches.
The stats also say that Curlin is a generation or two out from the chefs in his pedigree. The closet one is his grandfather Mr. Prospector, who came in second to Secretariat back in the day. Even coming in second to Secretariat, Mr. Prospector sired enough winners that he’s listed as a B/C (Brilliant and Classic).
However, other numbers — like Curlin’s $10.2 million of earnings at this writing — say that he’s the richest horse in the world. So, Curlin and his connections are doing something right.
Whether he can pass on “the good schtuff” to his descendants is a question for the future.
Just Probabilities, but Still …
But, statistics or no, horses are living beings who have good days and bad.
Still, handicappers and breeders pay attention to dosage as a statistic that can indicate probable performance.
FWIW, new chef-de-race A.P. Indy, who’s still active in the breeding shed, is a good example of when the variables come together and how dosage numbers work. In his case, according to the chart, he’s an I/C. He was the 1992 Horse of the Year. Although he scratched in the Kentucky Derby, he won the Belmont, the Breeders Cup Classic, and the Jockey Club Gold Cup.
Indy’s Dosage Profile is 13-10-20-3-0.
Remember – Brilliant-Intermediate-Classic-Solid-Professional.
He’s got some speed in him, all right, but he’s also got some distance runners, too. Those numbers right of center probably contributed to that 1-1/2 mile Belmont Stakes win.
Let’s go back here, scroll down the page and take a look at Indy’s pedigree. He’s a direct son of US Triple Crown winner Seattle Slew, plus Indy’s mother was sired by Triple Crown winner Secretariat.
He’s got Triple Crown winners in close generational proximity “on the top and bottom,” as horsemen say.
Which leads us to a little secret about dosage …
Common Sense in Statistical Form
If you breed the best to the best, your odds of getting the best are better.
Now, for the secret
I wish the link were still here. But when I was first curious about dosage, I did some websurfing. I saw the dosage numbers for the 2004 Kentucky Derby, the year that Smarty Jones made his Triple Crown bid. I was amazed to look at those Dosage Profiles and see what history proved out.
That the beloved Smarty Jones did not have the pedigree to go the distance of the Belmont Stakes. His DP has very little to the right of center. But Birdstone. the winner (and spoiler) did.
Check it out – stats from Pedigree Online:
- Smarty Jones – 10-3-8-1-0
- Birdstone – 7-8-9-0-2
For more reading on dosage:
Dosage: Pedigree & Performance by Stephen A. Roman, PhD

Tags: A.P. Indy, Birdstone, chefs-de-race, Curlin, dosage, Smarty Jones, Triple Crown



December 15th, 2008 at 1:48 am
I was so glad to find this. After a lot of years following horse races, I don’t remember ever hearing the term before. I must have been too busy admiring the horses and trying to help my favorite across the finish line to listen to all that the announcers were saying.
It takes me a little while to get my brain wrapped around the numbers but it’s definitely something I want to learn more about. The Horsey Set is a great place to learn. Thanks!
December 15th, 2008 at 10:32 am
Thanks, Jo. If anyone talks about dosage, especially on TV, it’s more likely to be mentioned briefly in those segments on handicapping — which I used to mentally tune out. Like you, I always had my faves or made my picks from what I saw in the paddock before the race.
Also, dosage seems to have fallen out of favor. Yet, if you look up a horse’s pedigree, you see the dosage index. So, somebody’s still paying attention.
But, like anything else, it’s just an indicator of possible potential. The bottom line is in what the horse delivers at the track.
January 29th, 2009 at 11:20 am
I thought it was all rather common sense as anyone who has been to the track more than three times a year knows that Birdstone was the favorite in all of the Kentucky Derby Futures pools and only lost because of a stomach infection. As in all sports betting just follow the money line. But what will they say when Vineyard Haven wins the 2009 Kentucky Derby. Anything can happen in racing remember Frank Hayes and his mount Sweet Kiss! Happy hunting fellow enthusiasts.
January 29th, 2009 at 11:27 am
Thanks for stopping by, Big Red. It’s true that the Triple Crown Races bring out the casual race fans. They’re the only races that get lots of promotion and TV coverage. The sad truth is that the Breeders Cup doesn’t get much attention outside of racing. But the TC races get plenty.
That said, a lot of variables have to align (almost like lucky stars) for a horse to win. Talent and pedigree aren’t sure things. But that’s one of the reasons why it’s all so exciting.
Thanks for your comment.
January 29th, 2009 at 11:44 am
I know that this doesn’t relate to the article but where is Lauren Stitch? She was the best DRF handicapper for the Belmont Stakes. This coming from a reformed chauvinist. I miss her!
January 29th, 2009 at 11:57 am
The economy, dude. A lot of good turf writers are getting buyouts. (the news business term for “laid off.”)
Check this out. If the links don’t work, I’ll repost them.
But I think she’s found a new home, according to my Google search:
January 29th, 2009 at 12:03 pm
I was afraid those links would get messed up. Let’s try this again.
She apparently took the buyout at the DRF according to this:
http://horseplayerpro.21publis.....-stich.htm
And my Google search says that she’s at http://www.todaysracingdigest......ge=contact
February 12th, 2011 at 6:37 pm
Well, as long we we’re making excuses for Birdstone, Smarty Jones had career ending problems with his legs when he ran the Belmont. He’d been in ice and not out of his stall from his record breaking win in the Preakness until race day at Elmont. And he still had the heart to lose by only 3/4 of a length at a mile and a half.
February 12th, 2011 at 11:09 pm
I remember seeing Smarty’s legs quivering after the Belmont. He was a game competitor and is, as of this writing, siring winners. Thanks for stopping by.
April 13th, 2012 at 10:46 pm
Hello, Could somebody tell mewhat mean the : DI , CD and GSV at the Dosage?
Thank you
April 15th, 2012 at 1:03 pm
Hi, Augusto – Good questions! Let me look into it, and I’ll get back to you here. Because you commented on this post, anything posted after this in this Comments section will go straight to your Inbox. Thanks for asking. It may take me a while – but I’ll work to get it here before Derby.
April 15th, 2012 at 5:49 pm
Okay, Augusto. Here is an excellent chart that will help you with the “alphabet soup” on pedigree charts. http://www.pedigreeonline.com/handicapping.php
I hope that helps. Here’s hoping your picks come in. Enjoy the races!